This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.

| less than a minute read

Court of Chancery Provides More Guidance on Fee Awards

In re Compellent Technologies Inc. Shareholder Litigation, C.A. 6084-VCL (December 9, 2011)

How do you set the fee to be awarded when there is no monetary recovery in a representative action?  For example, if the litigation creates a benefit to shareholders by reducing deal protection measures to permit a possible topping merger bid, but no topping bid appears, what should be the fee?  Using studies that attempt to calculate the benefits of such litigation, this decision sets out a methodology to guide applicants.


 

Tags

blog, complex commercial litigation, corporate counseling & litigation