This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.

| less than a minute read

Court of Chancery Requires Advancement Absent the Word "Advancement"

Fillip v. Centerstone Linen Services LLC,  C.A. 8712-ML (February 27, 2014)

Too often corporate documents refer to "indemnification" when they really mean "advancement."  Here the Court was required to interpret an agreement that really called for advancing attorney fees but did not use the word "advancement."  Hence, even if the right terminology is not used it still may be possible to win advancement.

Tags

blog, complex commercial litigation, corporate counseling & litigation